Ahmedabad, 13 April 2014

Watch here the dirty speak by Nehru-Gandhi family courtier and Vadodara Lok Sabha seat candidate Madhusudan Mistry.

Mistry was once known as foreign NGO person(he was OXFAM field officer). Later he was known as someone whom Shankersinh Vaghela brought to politics. In recent times he was known as someone who’s an organizational man close to Rahul Gandhi. But after his Vadodara candidature he is known as a cheap politician who attempts stunts, who behaves like a NGO activist(chanting slogans of Halla bol frequently), who uses dirty language(like in recent public meeting he called Narendra Modi a ‘naago(naked)’. Now given here is a video that mentions his remark on Sushma Swaraj in reply to someone probably a journalist. BJP has filed complaint before the election commission for Mistry’s this remark(presented below). Mistry stays exposed during this election.

Dt. 13.04.2014

To,

1) The Election Commission of India

Nirvachan Sadan,

Ashoka Road, New Delhi.

2) The Chief Electoral Officer, Gujarat State,

Block No. 7, 2nd floor,

Sachivalaya, Gandhinagar.

Sub.: Vulgar and insulting comments against women by Mr. Madhusudan Mistri.

Sir,

1. The General elections 2014 are in progress and all the political parties and their respective candidates have been fielded in each of the constituencies. Mode Code of conduct has been made applicable through out the country. During this period, one of the candidates of the Indian national congress party, i.e. Mr. Madhusudan Mistri, who has filed his nomination from 20-vadodara, Gujarat, have been making all the statements in contravention to the provisions of the model code of conduct and against the provisions of the representation of Peoples act 1951 as also the Indian Penal Code.

2. It is submitted that Mr. Madhusudan Mistri, have crossed all the permissible limits and restrains under the law by making loose and vulgar statements which directly is against the credibility and the dignity of women as a whole. Mr. Madhusudan Mistri has made a statement as follows:

“first of all she should get the medical examination done and then say that there is good news”.

This statement has been made in pursuance of the question asked by a media person to him that as per the statement of Mrs. Sushma Swaraj, there are all chances of good news what is his response to the said statement. While responding to the same he has made afore mentioned statement.

This statement is vulgar and is intended to tarnish the image of a woman who herself is an elderly person. Not only that the said statement is derogatory and against the dignity of the women fraternity as a whole. The election commission specifically provides that no person shall make any statements that would lead to corrupt practices and at the same time there shall be no appeal on the grounds of caste, creed, community, religion, sex, gender, etc.

3. The aforesaid statement is absolutely in contravention to the provisions of the model code of conduct and is also an offence in light of Section 125A [and also section 123(3) and 123(3a)] of the representation of people act 1951. It is also an offence within the meaning of section 153A, 153B, 295A and 505(2) of the Indian penal code apart from the other relevant provisions under chapter-IX of the Indian penal code.

4. In context of the aforesaid violations of the penal provisions of law by Shri Madhusudan

Mistri it is required to be brought to the notice of the election commission that the state authorities concerned have not acted with the requried alacrity and even FIRS have not been filed, wherever call for, against the above mentioned political leader. In view of the said the state machinery is soft pedaling in taking required action agaisnt Mr.Mystri so that his undesirable activities could have been property and effectively checked.

5. It is therefore prayed that while exercising the powers under article 324 of the constitution on India and all other powers enabling in this behalf, that the election commission may kindly be pleased to

A. Necessary FIR’s may be filled against Mr. Madhusudan Mystri and criminal proceedings shall be initiated agaisnt the same.

B. No permission should be grantd for holding any public meetings, public processions, public rallies, road shows, etc by the district administration authorities, where the above mentioned leader is expected or likely to participate and

C. All preventive measures shall be taken against the same under the relevant provisions of section 107 to 110 and 144 of crpc. to ensure that no acto of commission or omission is resorted to by him this has the effect of prejudicially affecting the public tranquility and law and order.

Thanking you.

Sincerely,

(R. C. Faldu) (Parindu Bhagat)

State President Convener, Election Legal Cell

Gujarat State Gujarat State

Bharatiya Janata Party Bharatiya Janata Party