Enforcement Directorate arrests former IAS Pradeep Sharma

Ahmedabad:Former Indian Administrative Service(IAS) officer Pradeep Sharma has been arrested by Enforcement Directorate in alleged money laundering case after Supreme Court rejected his anticipatory bail.

ED twitter handle twitted: ED arrests Pradeep N Sharma, an ex IAS officer in a PMLA case connected with corruption case in Gujarat.

Sharma is facing six corruption cases. He was suspended in 2010 following graft charges. He was arrested by anti corruption bureau in September 2014 for Rs 1.2 crore corruption case.

Sharma is accused of allotting land to textile major Welspun Group at discriminatory rate and causing loss to state exchequer when he was district collector of Kutch in 2004. Welspun returned favour by making Sharma’s wife Shyamal Sharma, a partner in Value Packaging firm that had long-term contracts of supplying packaging material to Welspun.

ED is investigation transfer of money by Sharma through hawala transactions to foreign accounts.

ED believes that Sharma has a Swiss bank account. ED’s claim is based on a telephone call recording in which Sharma mentioned about foreign bank account. A witness too has confirmed before the investigation team that Sharma has foreign bank account.

ED had tried to arrest Sharma in February last year, however Sharma was not found. Later Sharma managed to have relief from Supreme Court which directed ED officials not to arrest him, but also directed Sharma to appear before ED when asked for. Sharma was later summoned by ED repeatedly but he didn’t turn up. ED then again went to Supreme Court and sought his arrest for custodial interrogation. Sharma had given Rs 73 lakh interest-free loan to Mr Jhunjhunwala. ED argues that considering Sharma’s salary as government official, this amount was big. DeshGujarat

PTI reports: The Enforcement Directorate arrested suspended Gujarat-cadre IAS officer Pradeep Sharma today in connection with a money laundering case.

Officials said Sharma had been booked under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) based on an FIR of the Gujarat CID. He was arrested after he reached the office of the ED here for interrogation.

They claimed that the 1994-batch officer was not cooperating with the investigators so his custodial interrogation was necessary.

The Supreme Court had recently vacated an interim stay on his arrest after the ED filed an affidavit seeking his arrest in the case.

The case pertains to sanction of government land in Bhuj for industrial use to Ms Welspun India Limited, and its group companies, Welspun Power and Steel and Welspun Gujarat Style Roharan, in 2004 when Sharma was the District Collector and Chairman of the District Land Evaluation and Pricing Committee.

The central agency’s probe in the case found that Sharma had allegedly “sanctioned huge land at cheaper price to Ms Welspun India Ltd. and its sister concerns Ms Welspun Gujarat Stahi Rohren, Ms Welspun Power and Steel company by manipulative acts in gross violation of norms, instructions and guidelines as laid down by the state government of Gujarat”.

Through this allotment, Sharma, in connivance with some others, “has allegedly caused financial losses to the state government to the tune of Rs 1.20 crore (approx)”, the agency said.

“Against this favour, he has received gain to the tune of Rs 22 lakh in the name of his wife Shyamal P Sharma within a short period of 15 months by just investing Rs 1 lakh (in January 2008) in one Ms Value Packaging,” the ED probe report said.

The ED invoked PMLA alleging that the money was first deposited in his wife’s overseas bank account and then transferred to his account in violation of the Act.

The CID had arrested Sharma in this case and he later got bail.

The ED suspects that Sharma is the beneficiary of an alleged undisclosed Swiss bank account. It has attached Sharma’s assets worth Rs 75 lakh in this case.

Sharma had earlier filed a petition in the Supreme Court alleging that he was being victimised by the then Narendra Modi government in Gujarat and had sought a CBI inquiry into the cases against him. However, the Supreme Court had rejected his application.