Ahmedabad

As a group of lawyer including Prashant Bhushan and Anand Grover reached Supreme Court Chief Justice’s home in Delhi late in the night, the Chief Justice heard them and decided to hear the case of convicted terrorist Yakub Memon. At 3.20 am hearing started in Supreme Court by bench of three judges led by Justice Dipak Mishra. After hearing Yakub Memon’s lawyer and Attorney General both, the court started dictating verdict post 4.20 am and rejected Yakub’s plea by 5.00 am. Yakub’s lawyer wanted to give Yakub 14 more days. Court observed that staying the death warrant will be a travesty of justice. The court also observed that it doesn’t think in a case of this nature, granting further time is necessary. After verdict, AG Mukul Rohatgi said it is not a question of victory; legal process has to come to an end after all.

AG after verdict:

AG after the judgment on Yakub's last plea @htTweets pic.twitter.com/vXM6XakNKR

— Rajesh Ahuja (@iamrajeshahuja) July 29, 2015

PTI report

New Delhi

Yakub Memon, Mumbai blasts convict, will be hanged shortly with the Supreme Court dismissing his last-minute attempt to escape the gallows by rejecting his plea for a stay on the death warrant.

“Stay of death warrant would be a travesty of justice.

The plea is dismissed,” said Justice Dipak Misra, heading a three-judge bench, in an order in Court Room 4 which was opened for an unprecedented 90-minute hearing that started at 3.20 AM and ended a little before dawn.

The court’s decision brings the curtain down on the last- ditch attempts by Memon’s lawyers to stop the execution scheduled at 7 AM at Nagpur Central Jail. .

The denouement came after fast-paced developments the whole of Wednesday when the Supreme Court had upheld the death warrant and President Pranab Mukherjee and Maharashtra Governor Ch Vidyasagar Rao rejecting Memon’s mercy petition.

Late in the night, lawyers for Memon changed strategy and rushed to the residence Chief Justice of India H L Dattu and petitioned him for an urgent hearing to stay the hanging on the ground that 14 days time should be given to death row convict to enable him challenge the rejection and for other purposes.

After consultations, the CJI constituted the same three-judge bench that had earlier decided on the death warrant issue to go into the late night plea.

Senior lawyers Anand Grover and Yug Chowdhury said that the authorities were “hell bent” on executing Memon without giving him the right to challenge the rejection of his mercy petition by the President as right to life of a condemned prisoner last till his last breath.

Grover said a death row convict is entitled to 14 days reprieve after rejection of mercy plea for various purposes.

Opposing Memon’s plea, Attorney General Mukul Rohtagi contended that Memon’s fresh plea amounts to abusing the system.

A death warrant upheld just 10 hours ago by three judges cannot be quashed, he said, adding that the whole attempt appeared to be to prolong the stay in jail and get the sentenced commuted. .

Dictating the order, Justice Misra said ample opportunity was granted to the convict after rejection of the first mercy petition by the President on April 11, 2014 which was communicated to him on May 26, 2014.

He said the rejection could have been assailed before the Supreme Court.

Justice Misra observed that really ample time was granted after rejection of the first mercy petition to prepare himself for the last and final meeting with family members and all other purposes.

“As a consequence, if we have to stay the death warrant it would be a travesty of justice,” the bench said, adding that “we do not find any merit in the writ petition”.

Further, it said while pronouncing the order yesterday “we have not perceived any error in the death warrant issued by the TADA court on April 30 for the execution on July 30.

In the instant case, it is a clear expose of assertion of concept of justice in a totally different backdrop, the court said.

The bench said the AG had submitted that at the drop of a hat one can add new challenges and developments and expect the President to act in exercise of power under Article 72 and thereafter on rejection of clemency they would challenge that in a court of law.

“We will be failing in our duty by allowing so,” it said.

The court observed that on the first glance the submissions made on behalf of Memon looked attractive but on finer consideration the case of the convict does not carry much weight.

Reacting to the order, Grover said it was a tragic mistake and a wrong decision.

The AG said the legal process has come to an end and it was not a question of victory.