If sex workers engaged in prostitution of their own volition, it’s not a crime:Gujarat HC


Surat: Vinod Patel, who allegedly visited a brothel in Surat on January 3 was nabbed along with five others in a police raid and booked under provisions of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act and also under section 370 of the IPC. Patel moved the High Court saying that he was not caught in the company of any sex worker or victim but was waiting for his turn. Hence, he was not an offender indulging in exploitation of a person in flesh trade against the victim’s will. On Friday, in response to Patel’s quashing petition, Gujarat High Court in its order observed that a criminal case is not maintainable against “sex workers engaged in prostitution of their own volition, and not due to any inducement, force or coercion“. The HC quashed charges under Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act against Patel by stating that they are not maintainable because he was not part of the racket which ran prostitution and earned by exploiting sex workers. However, the court refused to quash charges of section 370 of the IPC and said the incident was subject to probe, which would prove whether he had already paid the amount and that he should fall in the category of the customer, who too is liable to be punished. The court was interpreting provisions of Section 370 of the Indian Penal Code which refer to physical or sexual exploitation and slavery which were made more stringent by the Centre after the Nirbhaya gangrape case. Even a customer of a sex worker is covered under the definition of `offender’ in this section as far as prostitution is concerned. Justice J B Pardiwala referred to an exhaustive debate that took place before Justice J S Verma Commission, who made recommendations for amendment in legislation after the Nirbhaya case.